malnpudl: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] malnpudl at 10:10pm on 26/08/2013
Day 3 bonus post, since this is apparently my year for aged electronics & appliances to die.

Latest casualty: My 12-year-old cheap-ass budget-brand countertop microwave just started making appalling noises. I think it's time for it to go the way of all things -- which is so say, to the next free electronics recycling event.

Consumer Reports seems to think highly of the various Kenmore (Sears) models -- not latest-bestest-mostest or anything, but good features, value, usability, and reliability at a relatively affordable price.

Question for the hive mind: Apparently there's a new thing since I last shopped for a microwave, where it has a built-in sensor to tweak cooking times for you... something about sensing moisture? That sounds pretty awesome, but it means spending around $140 instead of $80-ish, so I wanted to run it by you folks and see what you think. Is this feature as cool as it sounds? Because it sounds really, really cool to me. Would you go for the model with the sensor, or the basic, cheaper one without? (Assume that while saving money is always nice, I can manage the higher priced model and will be pleased to do so if the extra expense it's justified.)
There are 5 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
starfish: a porch swing with a book on it (Summerswing)
posted by [personal profile] starfish at 02:50pm on 27/08/2013
My main question is, do you cook in the microwave, or just reheat/boil water? Or, I guess, if you had the sensor thing, would you do more actual cooking?

My first microwave had two buttons (low and high) and a timer dial that went to 35 minutes. Some days I miss it. ;)
malnpudl: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] malnpudl at 05:33pm on 27/08/2013
I do, actually. At least, I steam a lot of veggies in the microwave. It's my primary cooking method for veggies, for a number of reasons.

I don't think I'd do more actual cooking? But it'd be nice to have assistance with not over-cooking things; I think that's the main reason I'm intrigued by this notion. I do a lot of stop-and-check, cook some more, stop and check it again, cook some more... it'd be kind of nice not to have to babysit it for fear of turning veggies into babyfood. *g*

And I know what you mean; my currently dying microwave doesn't do a whole lot more than on/off and time, and the features it does have are awkward and confusing, so I really only ever use on/off and time. *g* I really don't know that I'd ever do anything more sophisticated than that.
vickita: Vicki the Biker Chick (Default)
posted by [personal profile] vickita at 08:53pm on 27/08/2013
I was in the exact. same. situation. about a year ago. I think all those fancy whoop-ti-doo features are for people who want to do real cooking in their microwaves. Inasmuch as I don't do real cooking *anywhere* in my kitchen, and it's been years since my mic was used for anything but heating water for tea, heating up leftovers, and melting butter and chocolate for recipes, I decided I could do without them. *g*
vickita: Vicki the Biker Chick (Default)
posted by [personal profile] vickita at 08:55pm on 27/08/2013
YMMV, of course.
bonspiel: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] bonspiel at 12:53am on 29/08/2013
IIRC my parents' microwave has something like the sensor you describe (I live halfway across the country from them so I'm not intimately familiar with their microwave) and it seems to work quite well. If I were a big microwave cooker I might spring for it next time I get the chance to buy a new one. *shrug* Consumer Reports or Metafilter might have some more first-hand recommendations?

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31